Racism, early psychosis, and institutional contact: A qualitative study of Indigenous experiences.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence of Indigenous and ethnic minority inequities in the incidence and outcomes of early psychosis. Racism has been implicated as having an important role. AIM: To use Indigenous experiences to develop a more detailed understanding of how racism operates to impact early psychosis outcomes. METHODS: Critical Race Theory informed the methodology used. Twenty-three Indigenous participants participated in four family focus group interviews and thirteen individual interviews, comprising of 9 Maori youth with early psychosis, 10 family members and 4 Maori mental health professionals. An analysis of the data was undertaken using deductive structural coding to identify descriptions of racism, followed by inductive descriptive and pattern coding. RESULTS: Participant experiences revealed how racism operates as a socio-cultural phenomenon that interacts with institutional policy and culture across systems pertaining to social responsiveness, risk discourse, and mental health service structures. This is described across three major themes: 1) selective responses based on racial stereotypes, 2) race related risk assessment bias and 3) institutional racism in the mental health workforce. The impacts of racism were reported as inaction in the face of social need, increased use of coercive practices and an under resourced Indigenous mental health workforce. CONCLUSION: The study illustrated the inter-related nature of interpersonal, institutional and structural racism with examples of interpersonal racism in the form of negative stereotypes interacting with organizational, socio-cultural and political priorities. These findings indicate that organizational cultures may differentially impact Indigenous and minority people and that social responsiveness, risk discourse and the distribution of workforce expenditure are important targets for anti-racism efforts.

Mental Health Services Under Strain in Rural America.

Improvements are needed to address high rates of suicide.

A percepção da equipe de trabalhadoras do SRT acerca do domicílio e da produção do cuidado no contexto da pandemia de Covid-19 / The perception of the RTS team of workers about the home and the production of care in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic

Resumo Introdução: Os Serviços Residenciais Terapêuticos (SRT) são pontos da Rede de Atenção Psicossocial alinhados com a lógica da desinstitucionalização. O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar a percepção de 'casa' pela equipe de cuidadoras de SRT e suas implicações para a produção do cuidado durante a pandemia de Covid-19. Métodos: Estudo qualitativo de abordagem cartográfica que teve como cenário de estudo 4 SRT do município do Rio de Janeiro. Para a coleta dos dados, foram realizadas entrevistas com 9 trabalhadoras e observação participante de reuniões. Resultados e discussão: Os analisadores Lugar de Casa e Efeitos da Pandemia emergiram do processamento. O primeiro mostra a percepção das trabalhadoras acerca do ambiente da casa, enquanto o segundo traz a influência da pandemia na produção do cuidado nas SRT. O ambiente das residências é múltiplo, diverso e, por vezes, contraditório, permeado por diferentes modos de vida e influenciado por aspectos culturais, percepções e experiências vividas.

Abstract Introduction: The Residential Therapeutic Services (RTS) are places of the Psychosocial Care Network aligned with the logic of deinstitutionalization. This study aimed to analyze the perception of 'home' by the SRT team of caregivers and its implications for the production of care in the Covid-19 pandemic situation. Methods: Qualitative study of cartographic approach, which had 4 SRT in the city of Rio de Janeiro as scenario. Data collection involved interviews with 9 workers and participant observation of the SRTs' meetings. Results and Discussion: The analyzers Home and Pandemic Effects emerged from analysis. The first analyzer shows the workers' perception of the home environment, while the second analyzes the production of care and the influence of the Covid-19 pandemic on the SRT. The residence environment is multiple, diverse, sometimes contradictory, composed of different lifestyles and influenced by cultural aspects, perceptions and life experiences.

Police brutality and unmet need for mental health care.

OBJECTIVE: National movements have raised awareness of the adverse mental health effects of police brutality. This study examines the relationship between perceived police brutality and unmet need for mental health care. DATA SOURCES: We used the 2018 Survey of the Health of Urban Residents (N = 4338), a quota sample survey of adults in urban areas in the contiguous United States. STUDY DESIGN: Multivariate regressions were used to understand the association between police brutality and unmet need for mental health care. Unmet need was regressed on police brutality (the independent variable), controlling for sociodemographic and health status characteristics of respondents and access to care. We then stratified the sample by experiences of police brutality (no negative encounters with the police, encounters that were perceived as necessary, and encounters that were considered unnecessary) and described how medical mistrust and perceived respect within health care settings were associated with odds of unmet need for each subsample. DATA COLLECTION: Data were collected online. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Negative police encounters perceived as necessary were associated with greater odds of unmet need compared to no negative police encounters (odds ratio [OR] = 1.98, confidence interval [CI] = 1.30-2.65). Odds of unmet need were also higher among persons with negative and unnecessary police encounters (OR = 1.28, CI = 1.05-1.56). Greater respect was associated with lower odds of unmet need among persons who reported negative unnecessary encounters with the police (OR = 0.88, CI = 0.72-0.97). Medical mistrust was associated with greater odds of unmet need among those with negative unnecessary police encounters (OR = 1.52, CI = 1.12-1.93). CONCLUSIONS: Persons who are exposed to police brutality are also likely to be those who experience unmet need for mental health care. Ensuring that they feel respected within medical settings and establishing conditions that build trust in medical institutions are important for eliminating unmet need for mental health care.

Primary care teams' experiences of delivering mental health care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Integrated primary care teams are ideally positioned to support the mental health care needs arising during the COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding how COVID-19 has affected mental health care delivery within primary care settings will be critical to inform future policy and practice decisions during the later phases of the pandemic and beyond. The objective of our study was to describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary care teams' delivery of mental health care. METHODS: A qualitative study using focus groups conducted with primary care teams in Ontario, Canada. Focus group data was analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: We conducted 11 focus groups with 10 primary care teams and a total of 48 participants. With respect to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health care in primary care teams, we identified three key themes: i) the high demand for mental health care, ii) the rapid transformation to virtual care, and iii) the impact on providers. CONCLUSIONS: From the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, primary care quickly responded to the rising mental health care demands of their patients. Despite the numerous challenges they faced with the rapid transition to virtual care, primary care teams have persevered. It is essential that policy and decision-makers take note of the toll that these demands have placed on providers. There is an immediate need to enhance primary care's capacity for mental health care for the duration of the pandemic and beyond.

Continuidad de cuidados en Salud Mental infanto-juvenil

El siguiente artículo indaga las condiciones de articulación de la red socio-sanitaria en las prácticas de salud mental infanto-juvenil en el subsector público de salud en la Ciudad de Buenos Aires, siguiendo el hilo de políticas específicas de continuidad de cuidados en la red de servicios de salud mental en los últimos veinte años y las derivas presentes en la recepción de la llamada niñez en riesgo en sus recorridos de vida, singulares y colectivos. (AU)

De la lectura de lo contingente a la invención: Talleres del Equipo de Niñxs Turno Tarde

Escrito colectivo de quienes forman parte del equipo de Niños Turno Tarde del Centro de Salud Mental N°1, del Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires, que pretende transmitir cómo se fue transformando su práctica a partir de la creación de distintos dispositivos de taller, que surgieron como respuesta a la lectura de la contingencia clínica desde su orientación psicoanalítica.Quienes hacen psicoanálisis con niños saben que la infancia es hablada por otros discursos: la familia, la escuela, la medicina, etc. A la consulta suelen llegar traídos por la preocupación de otros, pocas veces por una demanda propia. Como posición ética en el equipo se detienen a evaluar de qué se trata en cada caso. ¿Quién sufre, quién se queja, dónde está alojado el sufrimiento?. (AU)

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and its related restrictions on people with pre-existent mental health conditions: A scoping review.

CONTEXT: Globally, governments have introduced a variety of public health measures including restrictions and reducing face-to-face contact, to control the spread of COVID-19. This has implications for mental health services in terms of support and treatment for vulnerable groups such as people with pre-existent mental health conditions. However, there is limited evidence of the impact of COVID-19 and its related restrictions on people with pre-existent mental health conditions. OBJECTIVES: To identify the impact of COVID-19 and its related restrictions on people with pre-existent mental health conditions. METHODS: A scoping review of the literature was employed. Eight electronic databases (PsycINFO, Cochrane, Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Academic Search Complete) were searched and 2566 papers identified. 30 papers met the criteria for this review and findings were summarised under three key review questions. RESULTS: COVID-19 and its related restrictions have had a notable effect on people with pre-existent mental health conditions. Public health restrictions have contributed to increased levels of social isolation, loneliness, and reduced opportunities for people to connect with others. Reduced access to health services and treatments has compounded matters for those seeking support. Exacerbation and deterioration of symptoms are commonly reported and can lead to greater susceptibility to COVID-19 infection. IMPLICATIONS: The importance of proactive planning, alternative accessible healthcare services and supports for vulnerable and at-risk groups is illuminated. Increased monitoring, early intervention and individually tailored care strategies are advocated. Recommendations revolve around the need for enhanced provision of remote support strategies facilitated using technology enhanced resources. ACCESSIBLE SUMMARY.

Case studies from the digital clinic: integrating digital phenotyping and clinical practice into today's world.

The following case series provides several examples from the Digital Clinic, an outpatient mental health program which uses smartphone technology to augment traditional mental health care. The themes highlighted in this piece, expanding emotional-awareness, symptom tracking, and medication management, provide real-clinical examples of how the Digital Clinic offered remote mental health care to a diverse group of people. Furthermore, the following piece demonstrates to practicing clinicians how digital technologies, like smartphone apps, can diversify methods of clinical engagement, assist with collecting health metrics in a safe and ethical manner, and promote person centred care. With the COVID-19 pandemic forcing re-evaluation of how mental health services are provided, it is critical to ensure that digitally infused systems of care, like the Digital Clinic, are effective, accessible, and scalable.

Motivation and methods of external organisations investing in mental health in low-income and middle-income countries: a qualitative study.

Mental disorders (including substance use disorders, dementia, and self-harm) account for a substantial burden of disease and economic costs in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), yet they attract little funding. External resources are urgently needed but evidence on investments is scarce. This Health Policy paper uses 35 elite interviews and documentary analyses to examine how and why external organisations have invested in mental health in LMICs over the past three decades, and how this investment has changed over time. Four levels are examined: organisations, source countries, recipient countries, and global landscape. Organisations have invested in numerous internal and external activities. Among the various factors shaping organisational decisions, actors (ie, individuals and organisations concerned with mental health) were the most salient at all four levels. To increase external organisation investments in mental health in LMICs, organisational leadership and understanding are crucial, along with increased political support in source and recipient countries, and a stronger governance structure at the global level.

Managing depression and anxiety in people with epilepsy: A survey of epilepsy health professionals by the ILAE Psychology Task Force.

Objectives: The Psychology Task Force of the Medical Therapies Commission of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) has been charged with taking steps to improve global mental health care for people with epilepsy. This study aimed to inform the direction and priorities of the Task Force by examining epilepsy healthcare providers' current practical experiences, barriers, and unmet needs around addressing depression and anxiety in their patients. Methods: A voluntary 27-item online survey was distributed via ILAE chapters and networks. It assessed practices in the areas of screening, referral, management, and psychological care for depression and anxiety. A total of 445 participants, from 67 countries (68% high income), commenced the survey, with 87% completing all components. Most respondents (80%) were either neurologists or epileptologists. Results: Less than half of respondents felt adequately resourced to manage depression and anxiety. There was a lack of consensus about which health professionals were responsible for screening and management of these comorbidities. About a third only assessed for depression and anxiety following spontaneous report and lack of time was a common barrier (>50%). Routine referrals to psychiatrists (>55%) and psychologists (>41%) were common, but approximately one third relied on watchful waiting. A lack of both trained mental health specialists (>55%) and standardized procedures (>38%) was common barriers to referral practices. The majority (>75%) of respondents' patients identified with depression or anxiety had previously accessed psychotropic medications or psychological treatments. However, multiple barriers to psychological treatments were endorsed, including accessibility difficulties (52%). Significance: The findings suggest that while the importance of managing depression and anxiety in patients with epilepsy is being recognized, there are ongoing barriers to effective mental health care. Key future directions include the need for updated protocols in this area and the integration of mental health professionals within epilepsy settings.

Mental health interventions for healthcare workers during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: In order to reduce distress associated with working with COVID-19 patients, several psychological intervention programmes for healthcare workers have been developed in Spain. We aimed to describe the main characteristics and components of these programmes for healthcare workers treating COVID-19 patients in Spanish hospitals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online survey was designed to evaluate the main characteristics of psychological intervention programmes for healthcare workers during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Valid responses were received from 36 hospitals. Most of these programmes offered both in-person and online therapy. The most common aim of these interventions was emotional regulation, which was treated by psychoeducational and cognitive-behavioural techniques in individual interventions. Group interventions mainly used psychoeducation and mindfulness. Only half of the teams that offered in-person interventions received training in the proper use of personal protective equipment. CONCLUSIONS: Several hospitals in Spain have developed mental health interventions for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, deploying a wide range of therapeutic modalities and techniques. The rapid implementation of these programmes during the pandemic suggests that safety may not have received sufficient attention. The planning and development of interventions for healthcare workers during pandemics merits greater attention by national and regional authorities and institutions.

Approaches to assessing the impact of robotics in geriatric mental health care: a scoping review.

The goals of this scoping literature review are to (1) aggregate the current research involving socially assistive robots in the setting of geriatric psychiatry and (2) examine the outcome measures used in these studies and determine where the gaps and needs are. In light of the global COVID-19 pandemic, the geriatric psychiatric population in particular is vulnerable to both the physical and mental toll COVID-19 may cause. Recently, socially assistive robots have gained attention for their ability to aid in the care of the geriatric psychiatry population and are being explored as a realistic way to deliver certain elements of psychiatric care that have the potential to be safe even in the setting of COVID-19. The results of this review indicate that robots are in the early stages of clinical applicability, they display usability for a range of psychiatric indications, and their impact on clinical care is notable. We project that in the next few years, robotic applications will be tailored to address clinical outcomes with a greater degree of precision and efficacy.